On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Prentice Bisbal <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/01/2011 11:50 AM, solarflow99 wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Prentice Bisbal <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On 09/01/2011 09:40 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: > > > Am 01.09.11 15:08, schrieb Prentice Bisbal: > > >> On 09/01/2011 08:36 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> recently I updated our ldapd on our RH EL 6.1 to the most recent > > version > > >>> openldap-2.4.23-15.el6_1.1.x86_64 (from 2.4.19-15) > > >>> > > >>> Since than the deamon died twice in the middle of the night, > > leaving no > > >>> traces to me why. > > > > > > I'd just use 389 instead, from my experience I can't see using openldap > > in production anymore.. > > > > > http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#How_to_install_389_in_RHEL6.3F > > > > I have just the opposite opinion. What's wrong with OpenLDAP that you > feel makes it unsuitable for production?-- oh:) I guess you tried both right? its your preference then, it wasn't my personal opinion which solution is better, just the one from practical experience and works properly. Hope it helps...
_______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
