Sorry I figured with 6.2 coming up it might be closer to getting out of tech preview, but I just reviewed the notes and its not so... oops :)
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:48, Musayev, Ilya <[email protected]> wrote: > RHEL6 has btrfs as tech-preview. I've been burned by tech previews before. > Also, if you recall there was a talk by FC15 maintainers and how they turned > away btrfs as main FS for OS due to instability. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan S Billings > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [rhelv6-list] You suggestion for 'big' filesystem management > Best Practice? > > On 10/28/2011 01:11 PM, Greg Swift wrote: > > actually on that note... i believe RHEL 6 has btrfs support now too, > > doesn't it? > > Well, if you're concerned about having a long fsck time, btrfs is the > solution, because there isn't a release-quality fsck for btrfs yet. :) > > -- > Jonathan Billings <[email protected]> > College of Engineering - CAEN - Unix and Linux Support > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv6-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv6-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list >
_______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
