-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2012 10:34 AM, Bohmer, Andre ten wrote: > Hello, > > Any advise or experience from production systems regarding > distributed parallel fault-tolerant file systems like Lustre ? We > would like to offer high performance, redundant storage via nfs and > cifs from Redhat servers. > > At this we've HP's XP9000 Ibrix in use, but performance is not all > that great.
Have you looked at Gluster? Red Hat bought the company last year and has released it as the Storage Software Appliance: http://www.redhat.com/products/storage/storage-software/ I've played with it quite a bit, and it is pretty nice. It offers good performance, replication, even geo-replication. Take a look at it and let us know if you have any questions. - -- Thomas Cameron, RHCA, RHCSS, RHCDS, RHCVA, RHCX Chief Architect, Canada and Central US 512-241-0774 office / 512-585-5631 cell http://people.redhat.com/tcameron/ IRC: choirboy / AIM: rhelguy / Yahoo: rhce_guy /Google+ http://ongpl.us/tdc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9U9yIACgkQmzle50YHwaBXhACfXbRHZ7o4T7ZYXuRA+tIjvIbT zOUAn1+aCd91Oehp9bVWR4ptwOUNC8/p =MVvb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
