Ayende, I have sent you the example, sorry for dirty code. My goal was to replace a trivial message bus I have written some time ago with something better, that's why I started experimenting with RSB. I intended to use message queues as a means of inter component communication and as the system grows there are more messages and overall performance depends heavily on message bus. I'll need to process several hundred or even few thousand messages per second . I'm not sure what performance we will get with RQ - in comparison, my messasge queue based on SQL server table has throughput of about 50-80 messages per second. In my system majority of messages don't leave the process boundary - so maybe something like in-memory queues with persistence would be ideal for such case. Best regards RG
On Apr 30, 6:29 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > Rafal,a) message consumers are trasient, this is enforced by the RSBFacility > b) I haven't done any perf testing for rhino queues, so it is not surprising > that you find issues. > Can you send me the sampe app you use for that? > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:10 PM, nightwatch77 <[email protected]>wrote: > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
