Do you think something like this would work?
static class UserExtensions : IUser
{
class RhinoUserAdapter : IUser
{
//...
}
public static IUser Rhino(this User myUser)
{
return new RhinoUserAdapter(myUser);
}
}
On 23 фев, 01:43, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> RS needs this information for several reasons:
> a) To get a GUID for the user.
> b) To be able to get user readable string for the user.
>
> It would be pretty easy to create an adapter for that, though. The
> requirement to be able to do so, however, cannot be easily waved.
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Vadim Kantorov
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > It seems a bit useless for me to implement SecurityInfo property. Is
> > there any scenario you would need it in your domain logic? Right now
> > it just means I need to reference RS from my domain assembly (though I
> > use security in the application layer only).
>
> > Can one use RS without implementing this interface?
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<rhino-tools-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
