Is the method/property you're trying to mock virtual/abstract or on an interface? If not, Rhino Mocks can't mock it.
On 12 July 2010 13:00, Thiago Padilha <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any way to allow this? I use some internal types on my > tested assembly just to better separate concerns, but theres no point > in making them public. I've already placed [assembly: > InternalsVisibleTo("Rhino.Mocks")] but it stills complain about types > not being public. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino.Mocks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rhinomocks%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
