Interesting idea....are there others out there who have had such a use? Tim
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bill Pierce <[email protected]> wrote: > Had a strange ask recently. Someone is interested in generating a Partial > Mock but rather than specifying the Type and constructor args, they would > like to provide an instance that serves as the partial implementation. I > haven't come across this before and didn't see a way to achieve it using > v.3.6. Has anyone achieved something similar? Saw a few > old<http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks/browse_thread/thread/32afc68ffd356678/a94c05fbce3dc818> > > posts<http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks/browse_thread/thread/3fad58af319b6d1c/dfab72dd7a78a0bb>, > with a "Feel free to submit a patch for this" reply. Hoping someone else > has done my job today. > > -Bill > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino.Mocks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rhinomocks%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en. > -- Tim Barcz Microsoft C# MVP Microsoft ASPInsider http://timbarcz.devlicio.us http://www.twitter.com/timbarcz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
