Hi.
Unfortunately i have little influence on the design of the code(and the
project is mostly done).
Its great that you took your time and tried to fix the problem.
I will give it a try, but do you know when can we expect this fix in new
release?
Because adding build RhinoMock.dll to project and referencing is an option
but VisualStudio nuget package manager ->RhinoMock is much more dynamic
solution and there is no need for manual updates in the future.
Dne četrtek, 25. oktober 2012 11:30:26 UTC+2 je oseba Steinkauz napisala:
>
> So i have a mocked object which has generic method
> public virtual void SendMessage<T>(T reply) where T : IRequest
>
> I have multiple classes which implement all IRequest.
>
> In code i am testing method gets called multiple times like:
> switch(type)
> {
> case Class1:
> {
> SendMessage(new Class1() );
> break;
> }
>
> case Class2:
> {
> SendMessage(new Class2() );
> break;
> }
> case Class3:
> {
> SendMessage(new Class3() );
> break;
> }
>
> //and so on...
> }
> I want to make sure NONE of this methods is called.
>
> But if i make m_provider.AssertWasNotCalled(x =>
> x.SendMessage(Arg<IRequest>.Is.Anything), o => o.IgnoreArguments());
>
> This doesnt assert right.
>
> Because if i call SendMessage(new Class1()) and then
> m_provider.AssertWasCalled(x => x.SendMessage(Arg<IRequest>.Is.Anything),
> o => o.IgnoreArguments());
> this failes but this
> m_provider.AssertWasCalled(x => x.SendMessage(Arg<Class1>.Is.Anything>()),
> o => o.IgnoreArguments());
> passes
>
> IgnoreArguments here is overkill, i know
>
> So how do you assert none of the generic method instances was called?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rhinomocks/-/xN8EHGAp2RcJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en.
