Le mardi 26 avril 2005 Ã 23:28 +1000, James Livingston a Ãcrit : > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 13:39 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > That's basically what I meant, I suppose it'd really doesn't make much > difference whether a source fills in the db, or a backend does it. One > (possible) advantage of having backends would be if you moved playlist > load/save to the backend, and then the existing playlist code (any > anything like it) would work irrespective of what backend it was using.
Yep, makes sense, that's probably the next step after rhythmdb abstraction, but it's not done yet since I didn't care about playlists when I started writing ipod support ;) > > Now that I think about it more I don't know if any players support the > equivalent of automatic playlists, The iPod rocks, so it obviously supports that ;) http://www.ipodlinux.org/ITunesDB#Smart_Playlist_Rules Christophe _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
