So that's why the merge branch hasn't been updated in a while. Can anyone provide the instructions for pulling it from gnome cvs?
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 10:20 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 17:04 +0200, �ivind Hoel wrote: > > Which brings me to asking where Walters is hiding? > > Well, Colin is very busy with other stuff. As you've seen in the past > couple of months, other people are interested in keeping development > going. > > The way we've (Colin and myself) pushed this first is the tla archive > has been closed for upstream Rhythmbox development. Development is now > done in GNOME CVS (as in the good ol' days), and we'll start pushing in > new features and bug fixes. > > Could everyone with patches pending in some devel branch of some kind > either: > - file a bug and attach patches for new features > - send small build/compilation/obvious patches to this list with a small > explanation of the problems it fixes. > > I'm willing to review the patches, and I hope Christophe will be able to > help out as well. I think we'll get a new release out in the next couple > of weeks. > > Let's get cracking. > > Cheers > > > On 5/28/05, Jaap Haitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is there a reason why the rhythmbox central archive > > > <http://web.rhythmbox.org/arch/2004> is so outdated? Last patch is from > > > January 2005 > > > > > > I personally like to use jhbuild to try out bleeding edge software and > > > jhbuild is currently using that outdated archive. > > > > > > I know that there are multiple archives of people which contain more > > > recent patches. E.g. I read overhere [1] that it was better to use > > > Archive: olemke core-dump info--2005 > > > Branch: rhythmbox--merge--0.9 > > > http://arch.core-dump.info/archive > > > > > > But how do I know as a newbie which archive I should use? The above > > > archive for instance is not listed on the website. > > > > > > I might be missing something because I'm not so familiar with arch > > > development, but I guess it will difficult to do a release now. Because > > > you have all this archives with different features and patches, which > > > have not been approved by the maintainer of rhythmbox. > > > > > > It seems to me it would be better to commit changes faster to the main > > > archive. These changes would get more testing and you don't need to > > > postpone all the decisions until just before a release. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Jaap > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/rhythmbox-devel/2005-May/msg00148.html > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rhythmbox-devel mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel > > > > > > > > --- > Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > _______________________________________________ > rhythmbox-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
