> The problem being that we don't really have "stable releases" and > "developer releases" at the moment. Technically we are calling them > "developer releases", however the actual stable branch (0.8) is > unmaintained, deprecated, and we suggest people use 0.9.x release > instead.
I see. I am trying to think of advantages and disadvantages using the Gnome model and the "one branch model". Would there from a developers point of view be any extra work using the Gnome model? E.g. maintenance of two branches? I assume following the Gnome model would mean new features twice a year for the end users. But I am not sure that is much different from how it works now? I wouldn't be surprised if many users just use the version of Rhythmbox that comes with their distribution. So these users wouldn't even notice the change=) Do you have the same feeling about that?
_______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
