Actually, this is a good workaround.
I did what Peter suggested and created an automatic playlist for 2
or more stars in the rating. I also added a second line item for rating
is 0. I then checked the "if any criteria are met". So that gives me
2-5, and 0, but not 1.
So now, any songs I don't rate are there, and as soon as I rate them
1, they no longer show up in the playlist.
This helped me so I thought I would share it with all of you. I
could live w/o the "Skip songs w/ one star" since a playlist seems like
the better way to handle this.
Thanks,
Joe
Peter wrote:
> Joe Webster wrote:
>> I've been using the rating system in rhythmbox to help weed out songs
>> I don't like. I rate them 1 star as I hear songs I don't like, then
>> later I sort by rating, highlight all the 1-star songs, and move to
>> trash. So far it works well.
>>
>> I had a thought that it would be nice to have an option that would
>> allow me to Not play/skip songs with 1 star ratings. That way, once I
>> mark it with one star, I won't hear it again.
>
> I do something similar: I have a "good stuff" search playlist setup
> three or more stars. I usually play a random selection from the "Good
> Stuff".
>
> The catch is that when searching it seems that "unrated/zero stars" is
> treated as a zero rather than a null (unrated). This means whenever I
> add new musics to my collection it initially his unrated/zero stars.
>
> I have to manually give it a rating of say 3 stars to appear on my
> "good stuff list". To make this as simple as possible, I have another
> "unrated" automatic playlist set to match zero stars. I then select
> all of the results, and edit their rating to be three.
>
> See also: Bug 345866 – Unrated versus zero / no stars
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345866
>
>> I tried to search the mailing list to see if something like this had
>> already been submitted, but the search is offline.
>
> I would like a rating-weigted random mode (where more stars means more
> likely to be played; but taking into account the total tracks for each
> rating), but that's getting complicated...
>
> Peter
>
>
_______________________________________________
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
