> Anyway, I put it once again, why Rhythmbox should have its own database > if Tracker already does the management itself? Heck, it even has support > for playlists and so on. Using native DB would only have sense if > Tracker is for some reasons disabled or not working correctly.
Tracker isn't installed on my (old) Ubuntu Dapper machine, and isn't even in the default repositories (I think). While its interesting, your idea does seem to mean adding a big new dependency to RB which could be contentious. Am I right in thinking that Tracker isn't even an official part of GNOME yet (i.e. the default install in the latest release)? Peter _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
