So the limit is not on bytes-per-file, but on records-per-file, and this because all the keys have to be in memory at once? I guess I am assuming the default bitcask back end.
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 03:31 -0400, Alexander Sicular wrote: > I think you are confusing the actual file size limitation of certain > riak backends with the theoretical limits of the riak system. To my > knowledge there are no such limitations with the current backend > default other than the physical capacity of an individual node. > Specifically, memory consumption per key discussed elsewhere. > > > @siculars on twitter > http://siculars.posterous.com > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 4, 2010, at 22:43, Mojito Sorbet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I see mentions of upper size suggestions on Riak database instances in > > the small GB ranges. (2? 4?) Can one reasonably expect a Riak DB > > to > > scale to a couple hundred terrabytes? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > riak-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
