ok, my ring seems ok now.
what i did was to change the rel/vars/dev[1,2,3]_vars.config file.
in there i was just replacing the ips...
this reip thing did not really work out ...

here is my riak ring now:
([email protected])1> riak_core_ring_manager:get_my_ring().
{ok,{chstate,'[email protected]',
             [{'[email protected]',{65,63451889794}},
              {'[email protected]',{13,63451889512}},
              {'[email protected]',{104,63451889512}},
              {'[email protected]',{49,63451889512}},
              {'[email protected]',{32,63451889009}},
              {'[email protected]',{94,63451889253}},
              {'[email protected]',{9,63451889769}},
              {'[email protected]',{97,63451889494}}],
             {64,
              [{0,'[email protected]'},
               {22835963083295358096932575511191922182123945984,
                '[email protected]'},
               {45671926166590716193865151022383844364247891968,
                '[email protected]'},
               {68507889249886074290797726533575766546371837952,
                '[email protected]'},
               {91343852333181432387730302044767688728495783936,
                '[email protected]'},
               {114179815416476790484662877555959610910619729920,
                '[email protected]'},
               {137015778499772148581595453067151533092743675904,
                '[email protected]'},
               {159851741583067506678528028578343455274867621888,
                '[email protected]'},
               {182687704666362864775460604089535377456991567872,
                '[email protected]'},
               {205523667749658222872393179600727299639115513856,
                '[email protected]'},
               {228359630832953580969325755111919221821239459840,
                '[email protected]'},
               {251195593916248939066258330623111144003363405824,
                '[email protected]'},
               {274031556999544297163190906134303066185487351808,
                '[email protected]'},
               {296867520082839655260123481645494988367611297792,
                '[email protected]'},
               {319703483166135013357056057156686910549735243776,
                '[email protected]'},
               {342539446249430371453988632667878832731859189760,
                '[email protected]'},
               {365375409332725729550921208179070754913983135744,
                '[email protected]'},
               {388211372416021087647853783690262677096107081728,
                '[email protected]'},
               {411047335499316445744786359201454599278231027712,
                '[email protected]'},
               {433883298582611803841718934712646521460354973696,...},
               {...}|...]},
             {dict,0,16,16,8,80,48,
                   {[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],...},
                   {{[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],...}}}}}
([email protected])2> 

i am using 0.12.1 on my mac and 0.12 on both vms. i have now a set of 100.000 
entrys like this (just for testing):
{"id":"42164", "actionTime":"2007-05-11 17:08:55", "action":"some action", 
"res":"7024", "user":"5", "client":"2787"}


and my mr job looks like this (just for testing):
{"inputs":"actionbucket",
 "query":[
   {"map":{"language":"javascript", "source":
   "function(values, keyData, arg) {
         
        var value = Riak.mapValuesJson(values)[0];
        if(value.reservation == '4084'){
                return [value];
        }
        return [];
   }","keep":true}}
   ],"timeout": 900000
}


the beam instances are all showing on "top" now, and there is some traffic 
going back and forth. (~200kb / s)

but this job takes like 1:30 min.

i know that this is not really comparable with a mysql query because you can do 
more calculations in the mr job to produce much more special results and the mr 
job has a ~linear "worktime"... but ~1:30 min is still pretty bad .... 

is there any way to do much better ?

best regards
nils

On Sep 16, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Grant Schofield wrote:

> 
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Nils Petersohn wrote:
> 
>> hello,
>> 
>> i was setting up 9 riak instances:
>> 
>> three on my mac with the appropriate app config
>> and six with two virtual machines on a different computer.
>> 
>> all 8 joined the [email protected]
>> and the join request was sent.
>> 
>> after setting this up:
>> i wanted to put data with the java client on [email protected] than i got a 
>> timeout ?!?
>> 
> 
> I am curious if you started this node and then changed its name in the config 
> file? Errors like this can happen if you don't riak-admin reip the node, also 
> the ring file would be wrong and this could lead to some of the other errors 
> you saw below.  One thing you may want to look at is the state of your ring 
> from the Riak console using riak_core_ring_manager:get_my_ring(). That might 
> show any problems with the ring, feel free to send that along so we can take 
> a look at it.
> 
>> when i put data on one of the other machines than only this machine was 
>> using cpu time and none of the other ...
>> if consistent hashing works like expected, than all the machines should show 
>> up on "top"
>> 
>> when i did a mapreduce job than only this machine was using cpu time and 
>> none of the other ...
>> 
>> i had "top" running on all of them.
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> the other problem is:
>> 
>> when i have 1/2 mio. entrys in one bucket with less than 100 chars for each 
>> entry
>> and i do a really simple mapreduce job, than it takes forever (15 minutes 
>> ...)
>> while sql uses .005 secons....
>> 
>> i know that doing a mr on a complete bucket, than it takes very long if i 
>> don't secify keys in the bucket. but how should i know which keys to use ...
> 
> What version of Riak are you using?  There has been a fair amount of 
> improvement to the map reduce system as well as list keys. Are the map reduce 
> jobs you are running javascript?
> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> if i put stuff in one bucket and add a machine with the join request, how 
>> can i rebalance the bucket???? so that the other machine is taking some 
>> values too.
> 
> This happens automatically. When the new node joins the cluster you should 
> see handoff messages in the erlang.log.X log file.   Rebalancing is handled 
> by the cluster and shouldn't be done manually.
> 
> Grant Schofield
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> 
> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> i don't understand these issues/behaviors (timeout, 15min. etc., 
>> rebalancing), maybe i was setting the one of the three params incorrect ? i 
>> left everything to the default settings.
>> 
>> thx in advance for any hints...
>> 
>> nils
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 

Nils M. Petersohn
xing.com/profile/Nils_Petersohn
blog.srvme.de
twitter.com/snackycracky
facebook.com/nils.petersohn
myspace.com/electrash

[email protected]
0049 (0)151 40 511 351
skype: nilz_berlin

Ebertystr. 47
10249 Berlin


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to