For reference then: C++ - http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ C - http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-c/
-mox On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Scott Gonyea <sc...@aitrus.org> wrote: > They are the same and you can actually see me plugging into the C++ code > here: > > https://github.com/sgonyea/pabst/tree/master/ext > > But as part of an Objective-C library (called ObjFW). So, the code is > actually an Objective-C++ wrapper around the C++ PB code, that exchanges > messages with Objective-C code (that hooks into Ruby). > > I believe Sean Cribbs has some initial C++-wrapper code in his Ripple > repo... Though he eventually abandoned it after C++ left him permanently > cross-eyed (I think that's why). > > Scott > > On Apr 8, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Mike Oxford wrote: > > Be careful here.. > > I do not thing Riak's "protocol buffers" are the same as Google's protocol > buffers. > Google's does bit-level packing and some other tricks that Riak does not > do, even though they both use the ".proto" file extension and very very > similar proto semantics. > > That said, if they ARE the same, then you can take the .proto files and > generate C++ classes, and use the secondary library "protobuf-c" to generate > C structs for the wire format. > > -mox > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:43 PM, David Leimbach <leim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Spent a little time poking at this today... Kind of surprised that there >> was no message defined for PingReq or for listing buckets. >> >> I realize these messages really have no usable payload, and just sort of >> have a tag and length, but for completeness it kind of feels like they >> should be there. >> >> Of course I'm not a Protocol Buffers expert in any sense, so I can't say >> whether this is a normal kind of choice or not. >> >> Dave >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Scott Gonyea <sc...@aitrus.org> wrote: >> >>> If we had this then a C-wrapper would be that much more attainable. So, >>> the author of such a lib would be a superstar in my book :). >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:46 PM, David Leimbach <leim...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > I've been writing a bit of code in Haskell to push data to Riak, and >>> the bindings are pretty easy to use (Thanks Brian!), but getting penetration >>> at my company for Haskell is going to take a little time. >>> > >>> > As such I'm just wondering if anyone knows of anyone working on a >>> protocol buffers version of a Riak client in C++, or if this is going to be >>> something I'll have to take on. >>> > >>> > I've found a few generic looking C++ projects that use Boost's >>> asynchronous IO stuff with protocol buffers to make an RPC system, but I'm >>> not sure if any of those are implicitly compatible. >>> > >>> > Guess I'm just looking for a pointer... >>> > >>> > Dave >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > riak-users mailing list >>> > riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
