Note that this is an HTTP limitation, not the datastore in general. That said, 
don't go crazy with them.

Sean Cribbs <[email protected]>
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/

On May 4, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Aphyr wrote:

> HA! I just ran into this limit!
> 
> 5,000 links like /tablet_users/whoever riaktag=following will cause your user 
> objects to take upwards of 4 seconds to return, on our beefy cluster, with a 
> variance of ~3 seconds. (Over HTTP, ruby riak_client.) I had to move them 
> into the JSON body, which makes things much faster. Hundreds of links seems 
> just fine.
> 
> --Kyle
> 
> On 05/04/2011 02:50 PM, Luc Castera wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Sorry for the Lil Kim reference on the subject line, I couldn't help it :-)
>> 
>> In the links documentation on wiki.basho.com <http://wiki.basho.com>, it
>> says:
>> "this can substitute as a lightweight graph database, as long as the
>> number of links attached to a given key are kept reasonably low"
>> 
>> What's considered reasonably low here? tens? hundreds? thousands? millions?
>> 
>> Has anyone published benchmarks or stress-testing results of this
>> anywhere for me to take a look?
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> --
>> ______________________
>> Luc Castera
>> http://www.intellum.com
>> Phone: 571-765-1982
>> Skype: luc.castera
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to