Hi Dave, First of all I think it is a great idea to combine riak and riak_search!
We are not using the java-based analyzers and so would have no problem with them being omitted from riak_search. Regards, --gordon On Jun 6, 2011, at 17:33 , David Smith wrote: > Hi all, > > One of the things we've got cooking at Basho HQ is a plan to roll the > functionality currently in the riak_search project into the default > Riak distribution. This means that using riak_search will become a > matter of flipping a configuration switch versus running a whole > separate instance. This will make it easier to use and deploy . > > As part of this merging process, we've realized that while having > Java-based analyzers is useful in some circumstances, it also imposes > a lot of overhead per search-query (if you're using it) and adds an > unwieldy dependency on the JDK to the Riak server. All the deployments > we're aware of do NOT use the Java-based analyzers; i.e. the default, > Erlang-based analyzers provide the necessary functionality with much > lower overhead. > > So, I'm soliciting YOUR feedback on the removal of Java-based > analyzers in riak_search. Are you using it in production and would you > miss it if it was gone? > > Thanks, > > D. > > -- > Dave Smith > Director, Engineering > Basho Technologies, Inc. > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
