Thomas,

This is a minor artifact of our build process that will be alleviated by the 
merger (we have i386 packages of standard Riak for RHEL already).

Sean Cribbs <[email protected]>
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/

On Jun 13, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Thomas Fee wrote:

> I noticed the riak-search prebuilt binaries for RedHat are all 64bits. Is 
> this merely a reflection of memory needs or of something more fundamental? 
> Mainly for development and QA, it would be bad if the unified riak couldn't 
> be downloaded and installed for 32bits.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Ryan Zezeski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Riak Users,
> 
> I'm happy to announce that Riak Search has now been integrated with Riak in 
> the master branch.
> 
> https://github.com/basho/riak/commit/1a4daa717ce9bb627e72fb7c32dda2ec84e02e92
> 
> To use Search you no longer checkout the riak_search repo.  Instead, you 
> checkout riak, build a release as you usually would, and then enable the 
> Search functionality.  It should be fairly obvious how to do this by looking 
> at `app.config` but there is a small README in the riak_search repo going 
> over this (which I should probably move into the Riak README).
> 
> https://github.com/basho/riak_search
> 
> Along with the integration work we have also decided to drop support for JVM 
> based analyzers (i.e. the Qilr application was removed).  While our analyzers 
> are not nearly as sophisticated as what is provided by Lucene we engaged with 
> the community and our customers and found that very few, if any, are making 
> use of this functionality.  Considering the cruft and general awkwardness 
> this caused to the riak_search code base we figured it was best to remove 
> this support for now.  Furthermore, this support was not free in that there 
> was overhead that had to be paid for talking with the JVM instances running 
> these analyzers.  This doesn't mean we won't possibly support more advanced 
> analyzers in the future but for now we have what we need for the majority of 
> use cases.
> 
> Finally, please bear with us while we update documentation and refine the 
> Search/Riak integration over the next couple of months.
> 
> -Ryan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to