Oops, actually I do get the following in the monitor:
Does it mean that loose consistency because of low mem / resources?
1> 14:21:00.395 [info] monitor long_gc <0.13156.5> [{initial_call,{riak_core_vnode_worker_pool,init,1}},{almost_current_function,{gen_fsm,loop,7}}] [{timeout,57},{old_heap_block_size,0},{heap_block_size,610},{mbuf_size,0},{stack_size,10},{old_heap_size,0},{heap_size,184}]
14:21:00.455 [info] monitor long_gc <0.609.0> [{initial_call,{riak_core_vnode_worker_pool,init,1}},{almost_current_function,{gen_fsm,loop,7}}] [{timeout,56},{old_heap_block_size,0},{heap_block_size,610},{mbuf_size,0},{stack_size,10},{old_heap_size,0},{heap_size,184}]
14:21:00.461 [info] monitor long_gc <0.13023.5> [{initial_call,{riak_core_vnode_worker_pool,init,1}},{almost_current_function,{gen_fsm,loop,7}}] [{timeout,57},{old_heap_block_size,0},{heap_block_size,610},{mbuf_size,0},{stack_size,10},{old_heap_size,0},{heap_size,184}]
( restarted instance, run query again)
1> 14:36:20.146 [info] alarm_handler: {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}}
Does it mean that loose consistency because of low mem / resources?
1> 14:21:00.395 [info] monitor long_gc <0.13156.5> [{initial_call,{riak_core_vnode_worker_pool,init,1}},{almost_current_function,{gen_fsm,loop,7}}] [{timeout,57},{old_heap_block_size,0},{heap_block_size,610},{mbuf_size,0},{stack_size,10},{old_heap_size,0},{heap_size,184}]
14:21:00.455 [info] monitor long_gc <0.609.0> [{initial_call,{riak_core_vnode_worker_pool,init,1}},{almost_current_function,{gen_fsm,loop,7}}] [{timeout,56},{old_heap_block_size,0},{heap_block_size,610},{mbuf_size,0},{stack_size,10},{old_heap_size,0},{heap_size,184}]
14:21:00.461 [info] monitor long_gc <0.13023.5> [{initial_call,{riak_core_vnode_worker_pool,init,1}},{almost_current_function,{gen_fsm,loop,7}}] [{timeout,57},{old_heap_block_size,0},{heap_block_size,610},{mbuf_size,0},{stack_size,10},{old_heap_size,0},{heap_size,184}]
( restarted instance, run query again)
1> 14:36:20.146 [info] alarm_handler: {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}}
On Nov 14, 2011, at 03:29 PM, "thomas.bikeev" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello list,
I am having troubles getting consistent results while counting keys in a small bucket containing +-33k objects. I do use secondary indexes: i.e:
query = client.index(name,"$key",key_start, key_end)
query.run()
The final count is never the same being off +/- 100 records, I also tried slicing the (hashed) keys and get count of the keys in the slices varying most of the time. Cluster consists of 3 2GB linode VMs running Riak 1.0.1
At the moment of querying there is no other activity that happens in the cluster, there is no ongoing transfers and riak console is clean as well.
Is there anything that I am missing?
Regards, Thomas
Run 1:
0 1 2140
1 2 2072
2 3 2063
3 4 2004
etc
Total: 32915
0 1 2134
1 2 2065
2 3 2071
3 4 1999
etc
Total: 32874_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
