Sean, I understand that they are still used when provided. The more fundamental question is: as good Riak citizens, should we consider Client IDs deprecated, and stop using them in new projects?
-- Andres 2011/12/18 Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> > Andres > > Client IDs are still used if the riak_kv / vnode_vclocks setting is false. > If it is true, the client ID will simply be ignored. For compatibility's > sake, it's best to send/set them still. > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Andres Jaan Tack < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I guess the fundamental question is: In new clusters unaffected by >> pre-1.0 shenanigans, should we *ever* be using client-provided ClientIds >> in our vector clocks, or is this method deprecated? >> >> I ask because I was deep into figuring out how to do this efficiently >> with the Riak PBC API for PUT requests, when I realized that the >> documentation for HTTP PUT no longer even mentions >> it<http://wiki.basho.com/HTTP-Store-Object.html> >> . >> >> If client-id isn't totally deprecated, I will probably start finding a >> way to shoehorn it into individual PBC PUT requests, as keeping a >> per-connection client id is very onwieldy. Please advise. :) >> >> -- >> Andres >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> > > > -- > Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> > Developer Advocate > Basho Technologies, Inc. > http://www.basho.com/ > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
