The kind of people that gravitate towards riak are ones who take redundancy pretty seriously, so forgive me if I try to choose words that I feel are on par to the expectation.
-----Original Message----- From: "Alexander Sicular" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 7:51am To: "Tim Robinson" <[email protected]> Cc: "Runar Jordahl" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: Absolute consistency shocked? dude. chillax. shocked would be like finding out the pope's gots kids. or we didn't land on the moon. or did we? there is so much magic abstraction going on here and just sending this email to you I'm shocked every time the anything actually works. -Alexander Sicular @siculars On Jan 5, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Tim Robinson wrote: > Ouch. > > I'm shocked that is not considered a major bug. At minimum that kind of stuff > should be front and center in their wiki/docs. Here I am thinking n 2 on a 3 > node cluster means I'm covered when in fact I am not. It's the whole reason I > gave Riak consideration. > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Runar Jordahl" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 12:13pm > To: "Thomas Bakketun" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Absolute consistency > > As Alexander pointed out, N does not mean "a separate PC". There was a > thread about this earlier: > > http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-February/003316.html > > Kind regards > Runar Jordahl > blog.epigent.com > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > > Tim Robinson > > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com Tim Robinson _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
