Hi Ian, thanks a lot for the answer. Yes this are all important points to consider.
Have you a suggestion what's could be better. Have a 'small' ring_creation_size and servers with lets say 20 TB / server or a higher ring_creation_size and more servers with only 4 TB / server. Best regards Sebastian On 01/25/2012 11:37 PM, Ian Plosker wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Sebastian Gerlach wrote: > >> Some other points in my considerations are the time required for a >> reorganization after a new node are added to the cluster or a node has >> been replaced. >> >> > > Sebastian, > > Sorry I missed this part of your question. > > The time required to rebalance a ring after adding or removing a node depends > on a number of factors. These include but are not limited to: size of > dataset, ring_creation_size, n_val, number of nodes, network throughput, I/O > throughput, and load. Unfortunately, it's impossible to say with much > accuracy how long a rebalance will take without accounting for these factors. > If you want to get some idea how long it will take, you should perform a > benchmark trying to mimic your hypothetical production environment as closely > as possible. > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
