Sounds great!

Thanks
Steve

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Brian Roach <[email protected]> wrote:

> Steve -
>
> Honestly, don't know. I think I've had that thought at least once :)
>
> I've got a couple things that I'm working on at the moment that need to
> get done for the Riak 1.2 release, but when I get a chance I'll take a look
> at it and see if there's any harm.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian Roach
>
>
> On Jul 11, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Steve Warren wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply! That's what I did (I expose Riak as spring beans
> and so destroy on context shutdown). But why not set the threads to deamon
> mode since they're support threads and avoid the issue altogether? Is it
> just too deep in another library or some other concern I don't understand?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Brian Roach <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Steve -
> >
> > Call the IRIakClient.shutdown() method when you're done with it - it'll
> kill the background threads.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian Roach
> >
> > On Jul 11, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Steve Warren wrote:
> >
> > > I've noticed that while using the java client library the jvm is not
> exiting when main completes. Is there a way to set the connection threads
> to daemon mode so they don't hang the jvm?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Steve
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > riak-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to