I've been learning Riak this week, which has been a lot of fun. There sure are a lot of warnings in the documentation about how slow listing all the keys in a bucket can be. However, I would assume that it would be efficient to list the keys in a bucket using the implicit 2i index "$key". Am I wrong?
I would like to be able to run a map-reduce job over the keys in a bucket, and use key-filtering to select the specific keys I need to operate on. Since most of the documentation examples of key filtering use the entire bucket as the input to the map reduce, we would expect those examples not to scale well. However, since it seems we can reference the secondary index $key as a map-reduce input, that seems like an efficient alternative. Please shoot me down if I'm mistaken. Thank you for the help! Dave -- Dave Lowell d...@connectv.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com