Deploying 3 instances of Riak on one node is going to be a pain, since you'll have to rename nodes and use different ports.
Go for 3 separate instances if they satisfy your performance needs. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Jimmy Ho <j...@jimmyho.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Have a question about deployment, hope you can help. > > I am working on a start up project, which means very little money to start > with and no guarantee whether it is going to gain traction. > > Using riak as I like the scalability and the API. > > It is not a mission critical app, and writes are not too frequent, so data > consistency is not of utmost importance in the early stage. > > Which of the below deployment make sense, considering budget constraints.. > > a) Deploy 3 nodes into a single EC2 Large (for faster IO) > b) Deploy a node in each of 3 Small/Medium EC2 nodes. > > Thanks for the help. > Jimmy > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > -- Best regards, Dmitry Demeshchuk
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
