On 07/21/2013 08:10 PM, Russell Brown wrote:

On 21 Jul 2013, at 19:15, Siraaj Khandkar <[email protected]> wrote:

On 07/21/2013 04:54 PM, Russell Brown wrote:

On 21 Jul 2013, at 14:20, Siraaj Khandkar <[email protected]> wrote:

On 07/21/2013 07:24 AM, Russell Brown wrote:> Hi,

On 21 Jul 2013, at 02:09, Siraaj Khandkar <[email protected]> wrote:

I (sequentially) made 146204 inserts of unique objects to a single
bucket.  Several secondary indices (most with unique values) were set
for each object, one of which was "bucket" = BucketName (to use 2i
for listing all keys).

There is a special $bucket index for this already, please see the docs
here http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/using/2i/


Yeah... I stumbled on that piece of info in another doc about two days
ago - made me feel both stupid and validated :)

However, it doesn't seem to work for me - I always get: {ok,{keys,[]}}

Curious. How do you make the 2i query to the $bucket index?

Just as bellow, but with "$bucket" instead of "bucket":

Index = {binary_index, "$bucket"},
riakc_pb_socket:get_index(PID, Bucket, Index, Bucket).

riakc_pb:socket:get_index(Pid, Bucket, <<"$bucket">>, Bucket).

As in the "$bucket" index is not a binary index, ($bucket_bin is what you've 
been using inadvertently)

Sorry it is not better documented.

Ah-ha! This way works! Thank you!




Oh. Erm. Have you deleted some keys? 2i is essentially an r=1 query.


Sort-of. This was a second instance of this batch insertion (a slightly
extended set of keys), the first one was deleted ~6 hours prior to
executing the second one.

At the end of the deletion there _were_ some tombstones left. Frankly I
do not remember with certainty if there are overlaps between tombstones
from previous delete and the keys in question. In retrospect - it was
big failure on my part not to take note of those.

After the second instance of the set insertion - there were _no_
more deletions.

So, in summary:

1) Inserted the set
2) Deleted the set
3) 6 hours passed
4) Inserted the set
5) Observed the problem

What is your delete_mode setting, please 
(http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/configs/configuration-files/)?


It is not configured explicitly, so I am assuming the default 3 second delay.



Did the second insert do a fetch to get a tombstone vclock before trying to 
overwrite the key, or a PUT with an empty vclock?


PUT with an empty vclock.

I need to look into this more, take some time to reproduce it, but I imagine it 
is something to do with deletes and then re-inserting the keys.

I'll post when I get something for you.


Thank you so much, Russell! I really appreciate you taking your time to help!




Now, I understand there may be a replication lag, but this state has
remained for over 3 days now.

"What is fucked, and why?" :)

Good question.


I was hoping this list would appreciate the reference :)


Could you provide some more details to help me figure it out: How many
nodes are you running?

5


Can you provide an example of the 2i queries you're running?

This is how I am testing it:

    Compare = fun(PID, Bucket) ->
        B = Bucket,
        L1 = riakc_pb_socket:get_index(PID, B, {binary_index, "bucket"}, B),
        L2 = riakc_pb_socket:get_index(PID, B, {binary_index, "bucket"}, B),
        io:format("L1: ~b, L2: ~b~n",[length(L1), length(L2)]),
        Diff_L1_L2 = L1 -- L2,
        Diff_L2_L1 = L2 -- L1,
        io:format("=== L1 -- L2 ===~n~p~n~n", [Diff_L1_L2]),
        io:format("=== L2 -- L1 ===~n~p~n~n", [Diff_L2_L1]),
        Fetch = fun(Key) ->
            case riakc_pb_socket:get(PID, B, Key) of
                {ok, _}    -> io:format("FOUND: ~p~n", [Key]);
                {error, _} -> io:format("NOT FOUND: ~p~n", [Key])
            end
        end,
        io:format("=== L1 -- L2 ===~n"),
        lists:foreach(Fetch, Diff_L1_L2),
        io:format("=== L2 -- L1 ===~n"),
        lists:foreach(Fetch, Diff_L2_L1)
    end.

Which results in differences _sometimes_, but _always_ fails on get.


If this is just a dev cluster, can you verify the keys are present /
absent using either a range 2i $keys query, or a key list, please?


Unfortunately this is prod, so brute-force key list is out of the
question.

Running:
    curl "http://127.0.0.1:8098/buckets/$bucket/index/\$keys_bin/0/z";

Returns:
    {"keys":[]}






_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to