Huh. I thought we were supposed to use "force-replace" instead of "reip"?
I remember having a discussion a few months back about the documentation and we cleared it up a little. Is "reip" the same as "force-replace", or is it more..."quick-and-dirty?" Is it deprecated? -B. On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Dave Brady <dbr...@weborama.com> wrote: > Thanks for clarifying it! > > This functionality has been *great* to create quick-and-dirty test rings. > > -- > Dave Brady > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Jared Morrow" <ja...@basho.com> > *To: *"Dave Brady" <dbr...@weborama.com> > *Cc: *"Riak Users Mailing List" <riak-users@lists.basho.com> > *Sent: *Lundi 21 Octobre 2013 16:42:22 > > *Subject: *Re: 1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no longer works? > > We actually discussed this recently, my understanding of reip was clearly > not complete, and Joe Caswell put me on the right track. 'reip' will > continue to stick around. > > -Jared > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Dave Brady <dbr...@weborama.com> wrote: > >> No problem, Jared! I'm happy it was a very simple fix. >> >> What concerns me is that the 'cluster' commands do not have an analogous >> feature: 'replace' does not do the same thing as 'reip'. >> >> Is it truly a foregone conclusion that 'reip' is going away? >> >> -- >> Dave Brady >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Jared Morrow" <ja...@basho.com> >> *To: *"Dave Brady" <dbr...@weborama.com> >> *Cc: *"Riak Users Mailing List" <riak-users@lists.basho.com> >> *Sent: *Lundi 21 Octobre 2013 16:17:52 >> *Subject: *Re: 1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no longer works? >> >> >> This was a mistake on my part, if you s/up/down/ (node_down_check) on >> that line it will correctly ensure the node is down before running reip. >> Sorry about that, clearly 'reip' is not heavily used with the new cluster >> commands and it slipped under the radar for all these months. >> >> -Jared >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Dave Brady <dbr...@weborama.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks to Joe Caswell at Basho: just have to comment out line 382 >>> (node_up_check) in the riak-admin script. >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Brady >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Dave Brady" <dbr...@weborama.com> >>> To: riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> Sent: Lundi 21 Octobre 2013 13:59:37 >>> Subject: 1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no longer works? >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> So, I went to copy /var/lib/riak/* from one five-node cluster to >>> another, so that we could experiment on the data. >>> >>> I did this fairly frequently in the past (< 1.4.0), and always used >>> "riak-admin reip <old> <new>". >>> >>> Now, when I try that command on our 1.4.2 ring, 'riak-admin' dies with >>> "Node is not running!" >>> >>> This confuses me, since "reip" requires the ring to be down, but the >>> "riak-admin" script is indeed expecting the local node to be running when >>> using this option. >>> >>> I see on the wiki that it is mentioned that "cluster replace" will >>> replace "reip" in the future. I hope not, since "cluster replace" does not >>> provide the same functionality. >>> >>> Anyone run into this and find a fix? (Or I am missing something >>> obvious?) >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Brady >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
