Thanks for replying :) Best regards!
On 11 February 2014 23:28, John Daily <jda...@basho.com> wrote: > After asking around a bit, I think we're likely to remove that > recommendation from the documentation. > > Tuning is always a bit of a dark art, so as always your mileage may vary, > but there doesn't seem to be any real advantage to lowering the thread > count. > > Thanks for raising the issue. > > -John > > > On Feb 3, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Edgar Veiga <edgarmve...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a 6 machines cluster with a ring of 256 nodes with levelDB as > backend. > > I've seen that recently in the documentation, this has appeared: > > If using LevelDB as the storage backend (which maintains its own I/O > thread pool), the number of async threads in Riak's default pool can be > decreased in the /etc/riak/vm.args file. > > How much is this relevant regarding the overall cluster performance? Right > now I've the defaul 64 threads. > > Best regards. > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
