That would be ideal I know, but would require a huge effort and is
something I am saving as a last resort. A custom extractor should allow me
to massage the value into a more index friendly format before sending to
Solr but allowing the value to remain in its current form.
I have no experience with this so I'm not sure the LoE involved in such a
task. Any advice is surely appreciated! Thanks for your input.
Andrew
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> That might happen.
>
> Could you rearrange your data to look like
>
> Id: ... , stats: {
> Stat1: [ ... ],
> Stat2: [ ... ],
> ...
>
> }
>
> Then you could do a stats_stat1 > 1 query. It's also more space efficient.
> Derived vs explicit naming. Stat(N) could even be an array of hashes like
> [{value:..., dates:...},...] if you needed that.
>
> -Alexander
>
> @siculars
> http://siculars.posthaven.com
>
> Sent from my iRotaryPhone
>
> On Oct 26, 2014, at 10:43, Andrew Zeneski <and...@andrewzeneski.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yes right, I was tired when I typed this; stats should be an array:
>
> {"id": 1, "stats": [{ "name": "stat1", "value": 1 }, {"name": "stat2",
> "value": 5}]}
> {"id": 2, "stats": [{ "name": "stat3", "value": 2 }, {"name": "stat1",
> "value": 3}]}
> {"id": 3, "stats": [{ "name": "stat2", "value": 3 }, {"name": "stat3",
> "value": 1}}]
>
> I haven't tried it either, but I was worried that stats_name = stat1 and
> stats_value > 1 would return both ID 1 and 2 because both have a name
> stats1 and both have some value > 1.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Haven't tried it out but should stats be an array?
>>
>> And the query would be something like
>>
>> Stats_name = stat1 and stats_value > 1
>>
>> I think the extractor flattens everything and separates with underscores.
>>
>> -Alexander
>>
>> @siculars
>> http://siculars.posthaven.com
>>
>> Sent from my iRotaryPhone
>>
>> > On Oct 25, 2014, at 22:53, Andrew Zeneski <and...@andrewzeneski.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All, I'm trying to determine if a use case is supported by Yokozuna
>> or not.
>> >
>> > With a stored value that looks like:
>> >
>> > {"id": 1, "stats": { "name": "stat1", "value": 1 }, {"name": "stat2",
>> "value": 5}}
>> > {"id": 2, "stats": { "name": "stat3", "value": 2 }, {"name": "stat1",
>> "value": 3}}
>> > {"id": 3, "stats": { "name": "stat2", "value": 3 }, {"name": "stat3",
>> "value": 1}}
>> >
>> > I want to find those who have stat1 > 2. The result should be id 2.
>> >
>> > I believe Solr 4.8 would handle this as a block-join, but I don't think
>> Yokozuna supports this feature. My first thought was a custom extractor;
>> are there other options I'm not seeing?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Andrew
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > riak-users mailing list
>> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
>> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
