Thanks to all. I'll take that option. Will let you guys know if I get any strange behavior.
Sent from my iPad > On Feb 19, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn <cmeiklej...@basho.com> > wrote: > > >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Daniel Iwan <iwan.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> My ideas: >> 1. Rewrite (read-write) object with new values for all indexes >> 2. Enable siblings on a bucket, write empty object with update for your >> index, that will create sibling. >> Then whenever you read object do merge of object+indexes. This may be more >> appropriate if you have big objects and want to "save" bandwidth >> >> Option 1 is definitely simpler though. > > Option 1 is the safest, least error-prone method for performing this. > > - Chris > > Christopher Meiklejohn > Senior Software Engineer > Basho Technologies, Inc. > cmeiklej...@basho.com > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
