Uhm, interesting, I didn't see that page; I believe the one I saw was about using Riak Search and that's where my assumption on needing to create an index to make a bucket_type came along.
Much easier though! Thanks! Alex On Saturday, April 4, 2015, Shawn Debnath <sh...@debnath.net> wrote: > Riak does not in any way rely on solr for its KV operations. Not sure > where you are seeing that or what code you are looking at but you can > define bucket types, activate them without ever touching solr. The basic > bucket type set up instructions can be found here: > http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/bucket-types/. > > On 4/4/15, 8:51 AM, "Alex De la rosa" <alex.rosa....@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','alex.rosa....@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > How to do that? > > For what I have seen, to use these special data types you need to create > a bucket under a bucket_type; and this bucket type is created following an > index so data gets indexed in Solr. > > On Saturday, April 4, 2015, Shawn Debnath <sh...@debnath.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sh...@debnath.net');>> wrote: > >> You do not have to set up Yokozuna (yz) to be able to use counters, >> sets, maps in Riak. Those types can be used independently via the Riak key >> value store. You only need to set up the indexes if you were to search for >> data via yz or search 2.0. And in that case, you can remove the generic >> mappings, keep the _yz specific ones and then explicitly add the fields you >> want to index/search on. >> >> On 4/4/15, 7:25 AM, "Alex De la rosa" <alex.rosa....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> To be able to use counters/sets/maps in Riak I have to store the object >> into a defined bucket_type indexed via SOLR. >> >> However, this will require extra disk space as data will be indexed (if >> using the default schema). Can I create a custom schema "ignoring" all >> fields so nothing is indexed? I don't need to use Riak Search on these >> objects, as I always know the KEY to fetch them. A schema like this would >> work? ( I guess that I can not put [ indexed="false" ] in the "_yz*" fields >> required by Riak, right? Or is it possible to not index that data either? ) >> >> —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> >> <schema name="schedule" version="1.5"> >> <fields> >> <dynamicField name="*" type="ignored" /> >> <!-- All of these fields are required by Riak Search --> >> <field name="_yz_id" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="true" >> multiValued="false" required="true"/> >> <field name="_yz_ed" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="false" >> multiValued="false"/> >> <field name="_yz_pn" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="false" >> multiValued="false"/> >> <field name="_yz_fpn" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="false" >> multiValued="false"/> >> <field name="_yz_vtag" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="false" >> multiValued="false"/> >> <field name="_yz_rk" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="true" >> multiValued="false"/> >> <field name="_yz_rt" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="true" >> multiValued="false"/> >> <field name="_yz_rb" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="true" >> multiValued="false"/> >> <field name="_yz_err" type="_yz_str" indexed="true" stored="false" >> multiValued="false"/> >> </fields> >> >> <uniqueKey>_yz_id</uniqueKey> >> >> <types> >> <fieldtype name="ignored" stored="false" indexed="false" >> multiValued="true" class="solr.StrField" /> >> <!-- YZ String: Used for non-analyzed fields --> >> <fieldType name="_yz_str" class="solr.StrField" >> sortMissingLast="true" /> >> </types> >> </schema> >> —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— >> >> Another question, can I use the [ compressed="true" ] to save disk >> space? in both <dynamicField name="*" type="ignored" /> and "_yz*" fields? >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >>
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
