Thanks Basho team for addressing every single question :-) It's very much supportive.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Kota Uenishi <k...@basho.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Generally speaking, 48/64GB RAM with 20TB storage is enough strong for > typical usage of Riak CS, like yours. I would like to mention that too > large disk size per node with narrow bandwidth may lead to less > availability - time to recover degraded replicas in case of node/disk > failure may take longer (because larger disk means longer time to > recover). That should not be longer than MTBF. To ensure the > availability, please make sure you have 5 nodes or more. > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Shankar Dhanasekaran > <shan...@opendrops.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > what is the RAM and CPU requirements for RIAK CS server with 20 TB > storage > > and about a max of 100 concurrent requests (mix of put and get) with a > max > > file size of request being less than 50mb. I am just looking for a rough > > figure so that I don't have to buy a really powerful server where it's > not > > needed. > > > > In this talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMyU6-pU6aw, Andy Gross > says > > "you don't want to run these on big enterprise servers but on basically > crap > > and when it dies ... install new servers" > > > > My servers come with 48/64 GB RAM with i7 quad core processors. My need > is > > basically more data storage than handling more requests concurrently. So > > what is the ideal 'crap' config for my need? > > > > Thanks, > > Shankar > > > > _______________________________________________ > > riak-users mailing list > > riak-users@lists.basho.com > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > > > > > -- > Kota UENISHI / @kuenishi > Basho Japan KK >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
