Cool, thank you :) however, is true that if 4 nodes are 1TB and the other one is 2TB; the 5 nodes will act as having 1TB each, right? (I guess that's what you mean with "Riak allocates data to nodes evenly")
Thanks, Alex On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jon Meredith <jmered...@basho.com> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Riak allocates data to nodes evenly - it doesn't take into account free > space. You should just be able to upgrade all nodes to 1Tb and Riak will > use the space, without needing to take any additional actions. > > Jon > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Alex De la rosa <alex.rosa....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I have the following question about scaling up vertically upgrading HDs >> to get more space. I have the understanding that if HDs are of different >> sizes on ring creation, they get the smallest size of them all and make all >> nodes even, for example: >> >> Node 1: 500GB >> Node 2: 500GB >> Node 3: 750GB >> Node 4: 500GB >> Node 5: 750GB >> >> In this case riak would make a parity of 500GB per node... so... how >> could we scale up the HDs? Imagine I want to turn them into the following: >> >> Node 1: 1TB >> Node 2: 1TB >> Node 3: 1TB >> Node 4: 1TB >> Node 5: 1TB >> >> How can you rebalance the cluster in the way their partitions grow to fit >> this new setup? (using Riak 2.1) >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> > > > -- > Jon Meredith > Chief Architect > Basho Technologies, Inc. > jmered...@basho.com >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
