Best to provide a specific sort ordering on a field if you can. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani
> On Dec 21, 2015, at 21:54, Garrido <zgb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No, we don’t provide a sort on the query, let us check and we can tell you if > its the same score, but, in case of search returns the same score, which one > will be the solution? > >> On Dec 21, 2015, at 8:21 PM, Zeeshan Lakhani <zlakh...@basho.com> wrote: >> >> The coverage plan can change per query. Are you providing a sort on the >> query? If not or if by score, does each item return the same score? >> >> Zeeshan Lakhani >> programmer | >> software engineer at @basho | >> org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | >> twitter => @zeeshanlakhani >> >>> On Dec 21, 2015, at 18:34, Garrido <zgb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Recently we migrated our Riak nodes to another network, so we backup the >>> data and then regenerate the ring, all is well, but there is a strange >>> behaviour in a riak search, for example if we execute a query using the >>> riak_erlang_client, returns the objects in the order: >>> >>> A, B, C >>> >>> And then if we execute again the same query the result is: >>> >>> B, A, C, >>> >>> So, in other order, do you know what is causing this?, before to change our >>> riak ring to another network, it was working perfectly. >>> >>> Thank you >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com