Hi Travis, Beyond performance reasons, this architecture is a bad idea from an availability perspective. If you lose one physical machine you'll lose two segments of your Riak cluster. And that's generally "not a good thing."
-Alexander @siculars http://siculars.posthaven.com Sent from my iRotaryPhone > On Dec 7, 2015, at 12:57, Travis Kirstine <tkirst...@firstbasesolutions.com> > wrote: > > We thinking of deploying multiple riak nodes on a few servers using vmware, 2 > vm with riak nodes per physical server. Is this a bad idea? > > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
