Would you forward the riak.conf for your setup and paste the first 30 lines
from a LOG file from any leveldb vnode a server that has experienced the crash.
Example lines from a LOG file are:
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559717 7f02a47b0700 Version: 2.0.10
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559850 7f02a47b0700 Options.comparator:
leveldb.InternalKeyComparator
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559862 7f02a47b0700 Options.create_if_missing: 1
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559869 7f02a47b0700 Options.error_if_exists: 0
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559876 7f02a47b0700 Options.paranoid_checks: 0
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559882 7f02a47b0700 Options.verify_compactions: 1
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559889 7f02a47b0700 Options.env:
0x7f03b40026e0
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559900 7f02a47b0700 Options.info_log:
0x7f0278002830
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559912 7f02a47b0700 Options.write_buffer_size: 35628845
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559925 7f02a47b0700 Options.max_open_files: 1000
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559933 7f02a47b0700 Options.block_cache:
0x7f0278001840
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559940 7f02a47b0700 Options.block_size: 4096
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559947 7f02a47b0700 Options.block_size_steps: 16
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559953 7f02a47b0700 Options.block_restart_interval: 16
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559959 7f02a47b0700 Options.compression: 1
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559971 7f02a47b0700 Options.filter_policy:
leveldb.BuiltinBloomFilter2
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559982 7f02a47b0700 Options.is_repair: false
2015/12/27-11:56:53.559993 7f02a47b0700 Options.is_internal_db: false
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560005 7f02a47b0700 Options.total_leveldb_mem:
23595048960
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560015 7f02a47b0700 Options.block_cache_threshold: 33554432
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560022 7f02a47b0700 Options.limited_developer_mem: false
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560029 7f02a47b0700 Options.mmap_size: 0
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560035 7f02a47b0700 Options.delete_threshold: 1000
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560043 7f02a47b0700 Options.fadvise_willneed: false
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560056 7f02a47b0700 Options.tiered_slow_level: 0
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560066 7f02a47b0700 Options.tiered_fast_prefix:
/var/db/riak/data/leveldb/0
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560079 7f02a47b0700 Options.tiered_slow_prefix:
/var/db/riak/data/leveldb/0
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560090 7f02a47b0700 crc32c: hardware
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560098 7f02a47b0700 File cache size:
4621898294
2015/12/27-11:56:53.560105 7f02a47b0700 Block cache size:
329028150
Thank,
Matthew
Happy New Year.
> On Dec 31, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Antti Kuusela <antti.kuus...@firstbeat.fi> wrote:
>
> Hi Luke,
>
> We erased the btrfs file system, replaced it with xfs on lvm with
> thinly-provisioned volumes and continued testing with a new database from
> scratch. The same problem continues, though. From /var/log/messages:
>
> Dec 31 03:35:31 storage5 riak[66419]: Starting up
> Dec 31 03:35:45 storage5 kernel: traps: beam.smp[66731] general protection
> ip:7f02280b3f16 sp:7f0197ad8dd0 error:0 in eleveldb.so[7f0228066000+93000]
> Dec 31 03:35:46 storage5 run_erl[66417]: Erlang closed the connection.
>
>
>
> 18.12.2015, 16:45, Luke Bakken kirjoitti:
>> Hi Antti,
>>
>> Riak is not tested on btrfs and the file system is not officially
>> supported. We recommend ext4 or xfs for Linux. ZFS is an option on
>> Solaris derivatives and FreeBSD.
>>
>> --
>> Luke Bakken
>> Engineer
>> lbak...@basho.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Antti Kuusela
>> <antti.kuus...@firstbeat.fi> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have been testing Riak and Riak CS as a possible solution for our future
>>> storage needs. I have a five server cluster running Centos 7. Riak version
>>> is 2.1.3 (first installed as 2.1.1, updated twice via Basho repo) and Riak
>>> CS version is 2.1.0. The servers each have 64GB RAM and six 4TB disks in
>>> raid 6 using btrfs.
>>>
>>> I have been pushing random data into Riak-CS via s3cmd to see how the system
>>> behaves. Smallest objects have been 2000 bytes, largest 100MB. I have also
>>> been making btrfs snapshots of the entire platform data dir nightly for
>>> backup purposes. Stop Riak CS, wait 10 seconds, stop Riak, wait 10, make
>>> snapshot, start Riak, wait 180 seconds, start Riak CS. This is performed on
>>> each of the servers in turn with a five minute wait in between. I have added
>>> the waits to try spread the startup load and allow the system time to get
>>> things running. New data is constantly pushed to the S3 API but restarting
>>> the nodes in rotation causes by far the highest stress on the system.
>>>
>>> I have encountered one problem in particular. Quite often one of the Riak
>>> nodes starts up but after a couple of minutes it just drops, all processes
>>> exited except for epmd.
>>>
>>> Following is from /var/log/riak/console, most of the lines skipped for sake
>>> of brevity. Normal startup stuff, as far as I can see:
>>>
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:04.446 [info] <0.7.0> Application lager started on node
>>> 'riak@192.168.50.32'
>>> ...
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:04.490 [info] <0.72.0> alarm_handler:
>>> {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}}
>>> ...
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:04.781 [info]
>>> <0.206.0>@riak_core_capability:process_capability_changes:555 New
>>> capability: {riak_core,vnode_routing} = proxy
>>> ...
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:04.869 [info] <0.7.0> Application riak_core started on node
>>> 'riak@192.168.50.32'
>>> ...
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:04.969 [info] <0.407.0>@riak_kv_env:doc_env:46 Environment
>>> and OS variables:
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.124 [warning] <0.6.0> lager_error_logger_h dropped 9
>>> messages in the last second that exceeded the limit of 100 messages/sec
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.124 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: Open file limit: 65536
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.124 [warning] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: Cores are disabled,
>>> this may hinder debugging
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.124 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: Erlang process limit:
>>> 262144
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.125 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: Erlang ports limit:
>>> 65536
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.125 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: ETS table count limit:
>>> 256000
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.125 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: Thread pool size: 64
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.125 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: Generations before
>>> full sweep: 0
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.125 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: Schedulers: 12 for 12
>>> cores
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.125 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: sysctl vm.swappiness
>>> is 0 greater than or equal to 0)
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.125 [info] <0.407.0> riak_kv_env: sysctl
>>> net.core.wmem_default is 8388608 lesser than or equal to 8388608)
>>> ...
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.139 [info] <0.478.0>@riak_core:wait_for_service:504
>>> Waiting for service riak_kv to start (0 seconds)
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:05.158 [info]
>>> <0.495.0>@riak_kv_entropy_manager:set_aae_throttle_limits:790 Setting AAE
>>> throttle limits: [{-1,0},{200,10},{500,50},{750,250},{900,1000},{1100,5000}]
>>> ...
>>> 2015-12-16 00:26:30.160 [info]
>>> <0.495.0>@riak_kv_entropy_manager:perhaps_log_throttle_change:853 Changing
>>> AAE throttle from undefined -> 5000 msec/key, based on maximum vnode mailbox
>>> size {unknown_mailbox_sizes,node_list,['riak@192.168.50.32']} from
>>> ['riak@192.168.50.32']
>>> 2015-12-16 00:27:12.053 [info] <0.478.0>@riak_core:wait_for_service:504
>>> Waiting for service riak_kv to start (60 seconds)
>>> 2015-12-16 00:28:25.057 [info] <0.478.0>@riak_core:wait_for_service:504
>>> Waiting for service riak_kv to start (120 seconds)
>>>
>>> And then nothing
>>>
>>> From /var/log/messages:
>>>
>>> Dec 16 00:26:02 storage2 su: (to riak) root on none
>>> Dec 16 00:26:04 storage2 riak[48174]: Starting up
>>> Dec 16 00:28:59 storage2 kernel: traps: beam.smp[48492] general protection
>>> ip:7fcaf9402f16 sp:7fca6affcdd0 error:0 in eleveldb.so[7fcaf93b5000+93000]
>>> Dec 16 00:28:59 storage2 run_erl[48172]: Erlang closed the connection.
>>>
>>> On another node at a different time /var/log/riak/console.log had similar
>>> messages, and also some warnings about invalid hint files, such as:
>>>
>>> 2015-12-13 00:15:41.232 [warning] <0.815.0> Hintfile
>>> '/data/riak/bitcask/570899077082383952423314387779798054553098649600/56.bitcask.hint'
>>> invalid
>>>
>>> In this latter example riak was started with "systemctl start riak" rather
>>> than "riak start". From /var/log/messages:
>>>
>>> Dec 13 00:15:29 storage1 riak: Starting riak: [ OK ]
>>> Dec 13 00:15:29 storage1 systemd: Started SYSV: Riak is a distributed data
>>> store.
>>> Dec 13 00:15:56 storage1 kernel: beam.smp[131820]: segfault at 160 ip
>>> 00007f24c0902ce6 sp 00007f24337fddd0 error 4 in
>>> eleveldb.so[7f24c08b5000+93000]
>>> Dec 13 00:15:56 storage1 run_erl[131501]: Erlang closed the connection.
>>>
>>> Of reported Riak bugs, this is similar to
>>> https://github.com/basho/riak/issues/790 . However, the poster of that issue
>>> reported that his problem was fixed by repairing leveldb partitions. I
>>> looked at this following
>>> http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/running/recovery/repairing-leveldb/
>>> but didn't find any errors.
>>>
>>> Incidentally, I started having problems with btrfs as well. On one node
>>> btrfs caused a kernel crash and on another kernel killed beam.smp process
>>> after it stopped responding for over 120 seconds while syncing to btrfs. The
>>> kernel in Centos 7 probably isn't best suited for working with btrfs.
>>> Advertised version is 3.10.0.
>>>
>>> So, my question is what is your take on this? Is this a bug in the leveldb
>>> library? The same one already reported? What log data would help debug or
>>> reproduce it? Or is there potentially some problem with my setup? Or could
>>> this be caused by a bug in btrfs? What is your take on using Riak with
>>> btrfs?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Antti Kuusela, M.Sc
>>> Senior Software Developer
>>> Firstbeat Technologies Ltd.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> riak-users mailing list
>>> riak-users@lists.basho.com
>>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>> .
>>
>
>
> --
> Antti Kuusela, M.Sc
> Senior Software Developer
> Firstbeat Technologies Ltd.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
