Hi Luke,

I do not have an advanced.config file since I switched to leveldb storage
backend. Generated configs attached.

Hopefully not relevant, the data root is on an ecryptfs volume.

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Luke Bakken <lbak...@basho.com> wrote:

> Hi Daniel -
>
> Did you forget to include the advanced.config file in your archive of
> configuration files? I only see three *.conf.j2 files. The reason I
> ask is that the following settings are critical to Riak CS functioning
> correctly:
>
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/cookbooks/configuration/
> riak-for-cs/#setting-up-the-proper-riak-backend
>
> I realize you have replaced the "be_blocks" backed with leveldb, but I
> would like to confirm that you have the other settings.
>
> In fact it would be best to archive the generated.configs directory
> from one of your Riak nodes to include here.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer
> lbak...@basho.com
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Daniel Miller <dmil...@dimagi.com> wrote:
> > I recently had another case of a disappearing object. This time the
> object
> > was successfully PUT, and (unlike the previous cases reported in this
> > thread) for a period of time GETs were also successful. Then GETs started
> > 404ing for no apparent reason. There are no errors in the logs to
> indicate
> > that anything unusual happened. This is quite disconcerting. Is it normal
> > that Riak CS just loses track of objects? At this point we are using CS
> as
> > primary object storage, meaning we do not have the data stored in another
> > database so it's critical that the data is not randomly lost
>

Attachment: generated.configs.tbz
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to