[ 
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-6456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nick Belaevski resolved RF-6456.
--------------------------------

    Resolution: Rejected


Both calls are necessary, because they call suggestion action with two 
different arguments. Suggestion box itself is not capable on filtering returned 
values, so we cannot use a single call.
You can switch off this feature.  

> [SuggestionBox] SuggestionAction called twice during request if 
> usingSuggestObjects = true
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RF-6456
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-6456
>             Project: RichFaces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Gerrit Brehmer
>
> SuggestionAction is called twice, if usingSuggestObjects is activated. I 
> looked into the sourcecode and found the two calls:
> - Action with value from request/input field (method setupValue - 
> setValue(suggestingAction.invoke(context.getELContext(), new 
> Object[]{submittedValue}));)
> - Action with "null" as string (method getRequestValuesData - 
> setValue(suggestingAction.invoke(context.getELContext(), new 
> Object[]{requestedValue}));)
> (SourceCode from UiSuggestionBox.java Tag 3.3.0)
> Is the second call really necessary? Because we call an expensive backend 
> method (200ms - 7000ms for address suggest) this makes a noticable delay for 
> the user
> Our workaround is to return an empty list for the second call, which doesn't 
> change the behaviour

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues

Reply via email to