[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-4075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay Balunas updated RF-4075:
----------------------------
Summary: Create "compatibility" flag to restore previous Iterable save
state functionality broken with RF-2076 (was: Regression!!! Create
"compatibility" flag to restore previous Iterable save state functionality
broken with RF-2076)
Component/s: regression
> Create "compatibility" flag to restore previous Iterable save state
> functionality broken with RF-2076
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RF-4075
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-4075
> Project: RichFaces
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: component-tables, regression
> Affects Versions: 3.2.1
> Reporter: Michael Youngstrom
> Assignee: Alexander Smirnov
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0.0.ALPHA2
>
>
> RF-2076 created a major Regression in RichFaces. This has been a long
> standing spec bug that a4j iterables were able to avoid for a long time.
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=153
> The problem is that now all my code depends upon the behavior of not
> discarding saved values. Would it be possible to add a "compatibility" flag
> to the iterable components that will allow them to behave the way they used
> to in not discarding saved state but allow those who want to match
> h:dataTable broken functionality can set it to true?
> This issue is also related to RF-2076 which was rejected. This issue is
> different from RF-2076 because it is specifically requesting both
> functionalities.
> Mike
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues