[ 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-11082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Brian Leathem updated RF-11082:
-------------------------------

      Fix Version/s: 4.Future
    Forum Reference: http://community.jboss.org/message/611091#611091, 
http://community.jboss.org/message/611091  (was: 
http://community.jboss.org/message/611091#611091, 
http://community.jboss.org/message/611091)


> rich:graphValidator doesn't work with iterable object graph field inside 
> nested composite components
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RF-11082
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-11082
>             Project: RichFaces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: component-validators
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0.Final
>            Reporter: Joshua Brookes
>              Labels: composite_component, graphValidator, validation, 
> validator
>             Fix For: 4.Future
>
>         Attachments: example.zip
>
>
> There is a known issue with Graph Validator where it can only resolve a 
> cloned object itself, but not variables derived from it ( uidata variables, 
> c:set, alias etc ). If you need to validate variables in the iterator, a loop 
> variable is needed to explicitly reference fields. This workaround does not 
> work when used in nested composite components.
> Validation will not use the values input into the form when the bug occurs. 
> This only happens when a class-level constraint exists on the class used int 
> he iterable field.
> This JIRA is for the latter issue, but an issue should also be created for 
> the original variant of the problem.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues

Reply via email to