[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-11544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12635227#comment-12635227
]
Karel Piwko commented on RF-11544:
----------------------------------
I think this is an usability issue, we should have it in the BOM to ensure by
import richfaces-bom third-party examples will be working and pick up correct
versions.
I'm missed your fix. Do you say that you want to javax.faces:jsf-api to BOM and
samples, but keep com.sun.faces:jsf-api for testing?
> com.sun.faces:jsf-api dependencies should be replaced with javax.faces:jsf-api
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RF-11544
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-11544
> Project: RichFaces
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: build/distribution
> Affects Versions: 4.1.0.Milestone2
> Reporter: Karel Piwko
> Assignee: Lukáš Fryč
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 4.1.0.Milestone4
>
>
> Description of problem:
> RichFaces bom contains com.sun.faces for jsf-api definition.
> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> 4.1.0-20110910-M2-redhat-1
> How reproducible:
> Always.
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Import org.richfaces:richfaces-bom
> Actual results:
> There is com.sun.faces:jsf-api and com.sun.faces:jsf-impl
> Expected results:
> There should be javax.faces:jsf-api and com.sun.faces:jsf-impl
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues
