[ 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12744957#comment-12744957
 ] 

RH Bugzilla Integration commented on RF-12304:
----------------------------------------------

[email protected] made a comment on [bug 
871933|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871933]

The client did not respond to my request [2] and I closed the case [1]. 

[1] 00736257 
(https://c.na7.visual.force.com/apex/Case_View?id=500A000000Bdb0gIAB&sfdc.override=1)

[2] Comment #17 on case [1]:
>>>
I'm reopening the case since the RichFaces developers have raised the following 
concerns:

1) You have an issue selecting rows in rich:extendedDataTable that is NOT 
caused by 
RF-12304 [1].
2) Disabling PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING fixes your issue.
3) You are expecting that this will be fixed in the next release.

Given that at this point we have no idea what is causing the problem, 
3) seems unlikely. Without a reproduction of the error, we have no idea what to 
fix.

[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12304

Regards,
Ilia
<<<
                
> A javascript error is thrown when the number of frozen columns = total number 
> of columns
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RF-12304
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12304
>             Project: RichFaces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: component-tables
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.2.Final
>         Environment: jetty + tomcat 6 on win 7
> tomcat + Chrome + Linux
>            Reporter: Britt Abel
>              Labels: richfaces
>             Fix For: 4.2.5
>
>         Attachments: error.png
>
>
> If I place two or more extendedDataTables with selectionType="single" on one 
> a page, it is only possible to make a selection on the first 
> extendedDataTable. It is imposible to select a row on the second table. If I 
> turn around the order of tables or delete the first one, it works fine for 
> the other one. This means, the implementation itself shoul be correct,
> Do you have any ideas? Thanks for your help!!!

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues

Reply via email to