[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-13126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12800759#comment-12800759
]
Brian Leathem edited comment on RF-13126 at 9/3/13 3:44 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your follow-up - I am not seeing the new table state format that you
referred to; please point me to it exactly ala expected json in full (that test
class also seemed to conform) - following is what I record as being set under
5.0 Alpha 1 (I was not able to get overnight snapshot going because of a
complaint about action methods for rich:commandLink) -
{code}
{"
columnsVisibility":{"col0":"1","col1":"1","col2":"1","col3":"1","col4":"1","col5":"1","col6":"1","col7":"1","col8":"1","col9":"1"},"columnGroupingState":{},"columnsSizeState":{"col0":"0","col1":"250","col2":"110","col3":"100","col4":"94","col5":"250","col6":"200","col7":"120","col8":"228","col9":"100"},"columnsOrder":["col0","col1","col2","col3","col4","col5","col6","col7","col8","col9"]}
{code}
was (Author: entracity):
Thanks for your follow-up - I am not seeing the new table state format that
you referred to; please point me to it exactly ala expected json in full (that
test class also seemed to conform) - following is what I record as being set
under 5.0 Alpha 1 (I was not able to get overnight snapshot going because of a
complaint about action methods for rich:commandLink) -
{"
columnsVisibility":{"col0":"1","col1":"1","col2":"1","col3":"1","col4":"1","col5":"1","col6":"1","col7":"1","col8":"1","col9":"1"},"columnGroupingState":{},"columnsSizeState":{"col0":"0","col1":"250","col2":"110","col3":"100","col4":"94","col5":"250","col6":"200","col7":"120","col8":"228","col9":"100"},"columnsOrder":["col0","col1","col2","col3","col4","col5","col6","col7","col8","col9"]}
> ExtendedDataTable Header Column Widths does not conform to Row Data Column
> Widths specified in TableState
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RF-13126
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-13126
> Project: RichFaces
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: component-tables
> Affects Versions: 5.0.0.Alpha1
> Environment: Windows / Tomcat 7 / JDK 1.7 (Firefox & IE)
> Reporter: Steven W.
>
> In prior 3.x release the ExtendedDataTable control supported TableState data
> for sizing of columns - this worked relatively well *however* there is/was a
> bug such that the columns headers above the table did *not* align properly
> with the data rows of the table below; this could be partially accommodated
> by specifying a size for the column (in the TableState data) that was wider
> than the longest string in the column data as he initial / minimum size.
> In subsequent release (in 4.x time frame I believe) the control was
> refactored and the TableState capability as a whole was lost - I saw this in
> another report on the forum or Jira though not the same but other related
> issues may be RF-4855 + RF-13094 and RF-13095 ; the report I remember
> reading, however, is that this TableState functionality was lost during the
> refactoring and was then said to be restored in a subsequent release.
> I am now using Version 5 of RichFaces to include the first milestone and
> latest (overnight) snapshot and am confirming this column header sizing
> AND/OR TableState table header sizing issue(s) still remain, regardless of
> prior attempts to include TableState data recognition and, if/as so, the
> widths of the column headers does not respect the TableState data nor do they
> conform to the column widths of the data in the rows below.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues
