What's wrong with this logic? According to the Affordable Health Care Law, the Employee and Employer Mandates become effective this year. POTUS says he is changing the law to postpone the Employer Mandate one year (after the 2014 elections). http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/10/us/politics/house-gop-pushes-delay-on-individual-mandate-in-health-law.html?_r=0 In response, the GOP leadership's response is: if the law is being broken for large employers, the Affordable Health Care Law should be broken for the Employee Mandate as well? 2 wrongs do not a right make ( except in Washington ) Or maybe the solution is: the next president should simply decide not to enforce the Health Care law sorta like the guy in the White House doesn't enforce immigration law. The immigration issue has broken down to 2 options. Democrats want to provide a "path to citizenship for 11 million uninvited visitorswhile the GOP wants to secure the borders before anyone is given "permanent resident" status. Simple choice. The democrats are going to win this one because they've blurred the lines between right and wrong The options on the table are not only both wrong, neither meets the Constitutional requirement of being "uniform". They are setting up a 2nd path way to citizenship for people whose first action in this country was to break the law. Both options on the table offer the invaders options not available to immigrants that came in the front door. Both plans are immoral and unconstitutional, but hey, maybe nobody will notice. Besides, we did it before. To establish anuniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States. article I,Section 8, clause 4, The right way is the Constitutional way; any other way is the wrong way. Get it? Alien, go home! The immigration issue has broken down to 2 options. Democrats want to provide a "path to citizenship for 11 million uninvited visitorswhile the GOP wants to secure the borders before anyone is given "permanent resident" status. Simple choice. The democrats are going to win this one because they've blurred the lines between right and wrong The options on the table are not only both wrong, neither meets the Constitutional requirement of being "uniform". They are setting up a 2nd path way to citizenship for people whose first action in this country was to break the law. Both options on the table offer the invaders options not available to immigrants that came in the front door. Both plans are immoral and unconstitutional, but hey, maybe nobody will notice. Besides, we did it before. To establish anuniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States. article I,Section 8, clause 4, The right way is the Constitutional way; any other way is the wrong way. Get it? Alien, go home! 2 wrongs do not a right make ( except in Washington ) When replying to this message, plz cc: [email protected] to assure prompt reply. TEA Party Nation Top Ten Tips For Getting The Most From Your TPN Membership! http://www.teapartynation.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_qgVn-Op7Q Mrs. Richard "Peggy" Martin (1935 - 2012) http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=margaret-irene-martin-peggy&pid=159081400&fhid=12241#fbLoggedOut http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/dfw/guestbook.aspx?n=margaret-martin&pid=159081400&sort=1 <> <> <> -- -- To join RichsRants, send email to: [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RichsRants" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
