Dear all,
 
I have some questions concerning the refinement of the gppd data and would appreciate your advice:
1) The patterns show some kind of texture(up and down on the error curve), but the sample is powder(although maybe the granules are large) and should be isotropic. All banks show this characteristic texture behavior.
2) For different banks, the sign of error for the same (hkl) gradually reverse, and it's hard to refine.
3) If UISO factors are let free, the refinement will go bad, even if they are constrained.
4) For one series of sample, the peaks are really sharp, the error sign is always like -/+/-, the positive error is very big and sharp.
5) There are some small peaks, which may be due to martensitic transformation. But they are really small, i don't know to what degree i should trust these data. Somebody said maybe that's due to contamination. If it is martensitic trans., how can i set a proper model to refine the data?
 
 
Sincerely,
 
Ling Yang
PhD student in Dr. Wang's group
701 Scarboro Rd
Oak Ridge, TN 37830
Tel: 865 574 0337
Fax: 865 241 5177
  • RE: ling yang
    • RE: Peter Zavalij
      • Re: ling yang
        • RE: Peter Zavalij

Reply via email to