Dear Tony, thanks for pointing this out. You are absolutely right. This mistake slipped our proof reading.
All the best, Robert. Wang <ian...@126.com>:
Dear Rietvelders, I might not be the first to ask this question, but I found the Figure 1.13 of book "Powder Diffraction - Theory and Practice" is problematic. The equation 40 on the previous page is correct. But the authors seems wrongly treated "??" as angle not radian when plot Figure 1.13, therefore the y- axis in Figure 1.13 missed a factor of "Pi/180". Thanks in advance if anyone could confirm this. Tony Wang Ph.D. of Physics, M.S. of Materials Science, B.S. of Solid-state Electronics Research Assistant | John de Laeder Centre Tel | +61 8 9266 7511 Fax | +61 8 9266 4190 Mobile | 0430868691 Email | <mailto:y.c...@curtin.edu.au> tony.w...@curtin.edu.au Web | <http://curtin.edu.au/> http://www.curtin.edu.au Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology. CRICOS Provider Code 00301J (WA), 02637B (NSW)
-- Prof. Dr. Robert E. Dinnebier Max-Planck Institute for Solid State Research Heisenbergstrasse 1 D-70569 Stuttgart Germany Tel: (+)49 (0)711 689 1503 Fax: (+)49 (0)711 689 1502 E-mail: r.dinneb...@fkf.mpg.de Web : www2.fkf.mpg.de/xray
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
