Dear Lubo, “Funny” shape is not that indicative. More important is that the second (020) peak appears notably broader that the first (111) peak, which is characteristic of the faulting.
Best regards, Leonid ******************************************************* Leonid A. Solovyov Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology 660036, Akademgorodok 50/24, Krasnoyarsk, Russia http://sites.google.com/site/solovyovleonid ******************************************************* ----- Original Message ----- From: Lubomir Smrcok <uachs...@savba.sk> To: Leonid Solovyov <l_solov...@yahoo.com> Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 3:21 PM Subject: Re: Peak assymtery not able to fit Well, I do not work with metals and therefore my question could be somehow naive. Suppose you have such funny peaks and you are sure it is not due to experimental conditions. How unique is than the interpretation offered by Leonid ? Nothing presonal, of course :-) lubo
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
