Greetings from HOT St. Louis, MO. I find it silly to discuss inclusion of a 64K image in email. In the early days (1970s) of useful scientific computing, we said, "core [memory/computing space] is gold;" we wrote our own programs; large programs were 50K. We have made progress. Our computers use OS which measure in the gigabits; memory/computing space is in the tens of gigabits; storage is measured in multiple terabytes.
How is it a server in 2015 cannot handle 64 KILObytes in an email attachment? Flame away! Frank May Research Investigator University of Missouri - St. Louis XRD since 1972 PS: I removed all the preceding emails except the most recent - in the concern to save bandwidth !!! ________________________________ From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] on behalf of Cline, James Dr. [james.cl...@nist.gov] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:08 AM To: Alan Hewat; David Elbert Cc: Fabrizio Guzzetta; Young, Lindsay Kay; rietveld_l@ill.fr Subject: RE: Obtaining a silicon standard wafer Hi all, The plot was generated for inclusion in a paper I wrote originally for the yet-to-be-published Volume H of the International Tables for Crystallography. Due yet another delay in the publication of Vol H, it is due to be published in the Journal of Research at NIST very shortly (it may go into Vol H as well sometime next year). Once this is done it will be available online for consumption. It is in the final stages of review; if you would like a preprint, send me an email.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
