I agree with Yaroslav Filinchuk's thoughts:

"However, the "structure solution in direct space" does not attempt to
work in the reciprocal space - all the manipulations are done in the
direct space."

RMC, normal MC, genetic algorithms, they all shuffle electron density in some or another way in real space. So 'real space structure solution' sounds the best, and 'real space' is better than 'direct space' as to avoid confusion with 'direct methods'.

Arie
ps: we should propose a new possible data value for _atom_sites_solution_primary By the way the data value vecmap (real-space vector search) is, I suppose, equivalent to a real-space Patterson search, which is indeed not the same as RMC, normal MC, genetic algorithms or other shuffle methods.


Mike Glazer wrote the following on 17/12/2015 12:50:
But the original question was:
What's the right nickname for the method of structure solution from powders, 
which instead of analyzing electron (nuclear) density shuffles atoms or 
molecules around a cell and compares experimental and calculated patterns ?
That's what we do with RMC in practice. We use RMC to create models and then 
compare with experimental patterns.
Mike

Professor A M Glazer
Department of Physics
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PU
United Kingdom
Tel/Fax: 44 1865 272290
Mobile: 0778 696 0537
******************************************
Vice-President of the International Union of Crystallography
Emeritus Professor of Physics and
Emeritus  Fellow of Jesus College Oxford
Visiting Professor at the University of Warwick
Crystallographer
******************************************
" Je ne te parlerai que cristaux" L. Pasteur (1850)


http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198744306.do


-----Original Message-----
From: Radovan Cerny [mailto:radovan.ce...@unige.ch]
Sent: 17 December 2015 11:03
To: Mike Glazer <mike.gla...@physics.ox.ac.uk>; Lubomir Smrcok <uachs...@savba.sk>; 
Leonid Solovyov <l_solov...@yahoo.com>
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: structure solution terminology

RMC covers only a part of the "Direct space methods", not for example methods 
using evolution algorithms.


Radovan Cerny
Laboratoire de Cristallographie, DQMP
Université de Genève
24, quai Ernest-Ansermet
CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
Phone  : [+[41] 22] 37 964 50, FAX : [+[41] 22] 37 961 08 mailto : 
radovan.ce...@unige.ch
URL    : http://www.unige.ch/sciences/crystal/cerny/rcerny.htm


-----Message d'origine-----
De : rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] De la part de 
Mike Glazer Envoyé : jeudi 17 décembre 2015 11:49 À : Lubomir Smrcok; Leonid 
Solovyov Cc : rietveld_l@ill.fr Objet : RE: structure solution terminology

This all sounds like Reverse MonteCarlo (RMC) modelling. We have used this with 
PDF analysis.
Mike Glazer



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



--
**********************************************************************
A. van der Lee
Institut Européen des Membranes
CNRS - UMR 5635
Université de Montpellier II - Case Courrier 047
Place E. Bataillon
34095 MONTPELLIER Cedex 5 - FRANCE

Tel : 33 (0) 4 67 14 91 35
Fax : 33 (0) 4 67 14 91 19

**********************************************************************
member of RECIPROCS - Réseau des Enseignants, Chercheurs et ITA
Professionnels de la Cristallographie Structurale (French professional
crystallographer network):
http://metiersit.dsi.cnrs.fr/index.php?page=ReseauMetiers&codeBap=B
**********************************************************************
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to